Flash News Sharad Yadav removes Nitish Kumar from party post      Mohanlal joins Svacha Bharat movement      P V Sindhu beats world champion to clinch Korea Open Super Series      Linking driving licence-Aadhaar soon      North Korea fires missile over Japan      Conduct an impact analysis      Trace 20,000 children missing from Kerala      Father Tom Uzhunnalil released from captivity in Yemen      Don't deport fleeing Rohingyas, India told      Exodus from Florida as Hurricane Irma approaches     
Bookmark and Share
Oj Corner
Special column
by OJ George

Conduct an impact analysis
There should be an automatic mechanism to have an impact analysis on various measures taken by the Central and State governments.

How the steps taken by the government have been either beneficial or detrimental to the people, particularly the have-nots, should be assessed.

The impact analysis should convince the governments concerned to take
Full Story
SHARE MARKET WATCH
 
 
Add your Comment comment
Kerala HC lifts life-long ban on Sreesanth
In a relief to cricketer S Sreesanth, the Kerala High Court today lifted the life ban imposed on him by the BCCI in the wake of the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal.

In his order, Justice A Muhamed Mustaque also set aside all proceedings against Sreesanth initiated by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

The court had earlier sought the BCCI's stand on the plea by the cricketer challenging the life ban imposed upon him by the game's governing body following the 2013 Indian Premier League-6 spot-fixing scandal.

The BCCI had filed a counter-affidavit on the issue in the court in response to the plea by Sreesanth, who had challenged the life ban despite a court dropping all charges against the 34-year-old pacer.

The cricket board had said, "The decision of the sessions court to acquit the petitioner from the criminal charges has no impact whatsoever on the decision of the internal disciplinary committee of the BCCI to ban the petitioner from playing cricket tournaments organised by the BCCI and/or its affiliates."

It had said the question before the court was whether the petitioner (and other accused) was liable to incur penal consequences under relevant criminal statutes.

On the other hand, the question before the BCCI Disciplinary Committee was whether the petitioner was guilty of match fixing, corruption and gambling and violation of the internal disciplinary rules of the BCCI, the board had said.

The standard of proof required under a penal statute was much higher than the proof required for a disciplinary inquiry, it had said.

All the 36 accused, including Sreesanth, Ankeet Chavan and Ajit Chandila were let off in the spot-fixing case by a Patiala House court in July 2015.

The BCCI, however, had refused to alter its disciplinary decision even after the verdict.
   
Other News in this category
WEATHER UPDATES


 
 
© 2009 OjNewsCom all rights reserved